Add Me!Free website submission and site
promotionSearch Engine Optmization

 

BIBLE GOD ENCOURAGES RELIGIOUS WARS

 

In the Bible, violence for religious reasons is encouraged and commanded.

 

In Genesis, God kills all the people on earth in the flood and spared Noah and a few others.  Obviously, he did not do this to save lives which would be the only justification for murder.  When God could kill people just because their morals do not fit with his perception of morals he could delegate this right to human beings.  Nobody can say that God is forced to kill to save lives.  Nobody can believe in God and denounce capital punishment even when it is extended to thieves and people who have sex outside marriage as an absolute evil.

 

Israel was told to wipe out nations and to fight bloody wars of religion – by the God of the Bible.  They had to destroy the Canaanites and the Amorites and others (Deuteronomy 7).  God specifically said that no compromise must be made with them but that they all must be destroyed.  The reason he gave for this was that they would mislead Israel into pagan worship.  At that time, there was no reason to think that Israel would have liked to do that and God should have waited until a significant influence started to take root.  God would not let them take even the slightest risk meaning that it is always wrong not to raise the sword against people who have a different religion from you just because they do.

 

Deuteronomy 13 commands the murder of Israelite persons and groups who begin to adore false Gods.  No one can say that God only commands this when it is murderous pagan religions that are followed.  If God’s people could kill them then they could spare them but force them not to practice the evil side of their faith.  Even if his people did murder many it would not justify killing all of them.  There were plenty of pagan nations to be feared so it was nonsense to kill some of them to prevent them taking over.  It would only encourage their neighbours to form a mighty coalition against Israel.  Besides, God swore that a pagan takeover of Israel would not happen if it remained under his authority.  The passage never mentions that only brutal paganism is meant.  It would say if it did.  Peaceable paganism must have been meant too.  It is unlawful to slaughter pagans even if they have a religion that offers human sacrifice.  The Catholic books, Radio Replies, state that God commanded the murders to bring home to his own people that idolatry was a most heinous crime (Vol 1, question 134).  This sinister doctrine implies that it is better to be murdered or to die than to fall away from God.

 

Christians say that Israel was a theocracy therefore it had the right to protect God’s authority as king by force and violence.  That, of course, is an inexcusable thing to say.  We don’t kill anarchists and we all live and think like anarchists a lot of the time.

 

Christians say that the pagans sinned so terribly that they had to be destroyed.  There is no evidence even in the Law that they did.  God said their deeds were abominations but that is not the same as saying they were wilfully evil.  So, God’s silence makes it plain that pagans are to be slaughtered merely on account of their beliefs which he does not agree with.  This is unsurprising for capital punishment is obligatory even though the victim could have committed the crime through some unknown mental ailment.

 

God told Saul through Samuel that he wanted to punish the people of Amalek for blocking Israel when they were coming out of Egypt by getting Israel to put them all to death and even the children (1 Samuel 15).  This was commanding war both for revenge and obedience to the Lord.  Christians will say that revenge was not the only reason but one reason and that the main reason was to eradicate their evil.  But God would have stated the main reason if that had been right and that is what a responsible and careful god would do.  God is condoning war for the purpose of vengeance.  Christians say that it was good of God to command things like that because there is a life after death for the dead babies who would have inherited the evil characteristics of their parents had they not been killed and that the parents should have been killed for they were irremediably evil (page 104, Christianity for the Tough-Minded).  Loads of evil parents have good children and even the Bible does not say that the Amalekites were that bad and besides God had founded no religion for them for the Hebrews did not want them in theirs and there was no trace of the doctrine of a holy and nice afterlife in Israel at that period of time.  God hadn’t revealed any of it so how could the afterlife justify what the Hebrews did when they didn’t believe in it?  What right had they to kill over Samuel who was only one man claiming to speak the word of God?  And it is judgmental to accuse the people God told Israel to kill of extreme obstinacy in evil.  It is not right that many Christians try to make up excuses – especially slanderous excuses like that - for the Bible’s version of God for that means they worship a kind of being they know is evil.

 

Jesus was certainly not a pacifist though he may not have lifted a sword against anybody when he was on earth.  He sanctioned the Law and the Prophets, the whole Old Testament as the Jews have it.  The Law and the Prophets promise that one day this king will come and lead the Church into bloody warfare against evildoers and unbelievers (Joel 3; Ezekiel 38-39; Zechariah 12 and 14; Daniel 2:44; Revelation 17:14; Revelation 2:26-27; Revelation 19:14).  Jesus claimed to be this king and that he would return as the Old Testament foretold.  When Jesus was not a pacifist it is hardly right to assume that he did away with the Old Testament’s murderous and bloodthirsty laws.  He never needed to fight when he was alive except when he caused a violent riot in the Temple.  He embraced his death because he said it was right for him to die and not because he thought that bearing arms was wrong. 


Read my book, Bible Commands Christians to Murder, and see how far the New Testament really is from pacifism.  My book demonstrates that the New Testament does not do away with the bloody laws that were formulated by God in the Law of Moses in the Old Testament.  A book that commands such acts should be banned for those who have no way to learn sense it is a malign influence on the person who is tempted to kill in the name of God.  Many disturbed people have read the Bible for it is so easily available and have found it to steer their urges in an extremely violent direction and to give them the twisted religious motivation to go out and attack and even kill people. 

 

The truth is that we are all disturbed to some extent which underlines how poisonous books like the Bible are and takes us closer to behaving like psychopaths.  Evangelical Christians who believe they are guaranteed salvation would see no reason why they cannot fulfil Bible prophecies such as by exploding a nuclear bomb in Rome to destroy the religion that the Bible says is the whore of Babylon.  It would be a sin it seems though when the Bible says the whore has to die and God and the saints approve it is impossible to see how it could be.  If it is a sin it is not much of a sin. 

 

Belief in a divine protector has given the likes of George Bush Jun the confidence to threaten nuclear destruction confident that God won’t let the world perish in a conflagration that will eliminate all life.  Even if religion gives comfort and support – a claim that I deny categorically – it is better for us all to do without it and be fairly depressed than to be part of something that will one day wipe out all life on earth forever.  Romans 13 says that the authorities that run even pagan nations are appointed by God and not to be overthrown.  When you think of all the decent men that would not wage nuclear war that could have been chosen as president of the United States and that Bush was the only one out of millions it is clear what the message is.  God chose Bush and you are not to shoot him even to stop him killing others.  The war he wages is God’s will in some sense.

 

Problem Religion Atheism
Fundamentalism, that is putting belief before people

 

 

Has beliefs and in danger of leading to fundamentalism.  Jesus sanctioned fundamentalism when he said that we must love God in first place

 

Has no religious beliefs.  Atheism is not the denial that God exists though many atheists do deny he exists.  Atheism is rather the absence of belief in god or gods.  Christians are atheists after all as far as Zeus is concerned.  They don't believe in the gods of paganism.  There is no possibility of fundamentalism in relation to atheists.

Atheism is purely a negative stance in the sense that it is the absence of belief.  The bloody regimes of Communism were not based on the absence of belief but on their own kind of faith.  Atheism cannot be blamed for what the Communists did.

Dogmatism, dogmatism is the attitude that "We are right and we are not going to change no matter what the evidence says". Based on dogma.

 

 

 

Atheists all have different ideas and approaches to life.  They make suggestions but do not enforce these suggestions as dogma.  The atheist who is dogmatic is really approaching religion in his attitude.  The proper atheist doesn't do that. 

Atheists do not see beliefs as truth.  Beliefs should be taught as beliefs and not as truth.  Religion seeks control of schools to teach beliefs as truth.  Jesus sanctioned this bigotry when he said that he was the Truth.

Disrespect towards religious belief

 

 

The Bible insults and mocks the Gods and beliefs of other faiths.  To insult a belief is to insult the God of truth that gave the belief and must be punished under blasphemy law.  Religion should not be criticised. Satire and mockery of religion may be necessary to stop it doing harm in the world.  These tools make great impact.  Religious beliefs are only human creations and everything human should be examined and we should have the right to say why we disagree with it.  Religion itself has to contradict other religion and criticise it to exist.  For example, Islam teaches that the Christian notion of God having a Son called Jesus who is also God is extreme blasphemy.  The Bible and Church says of the heretic, "Let him be anathema". 
Intolerance of religion

 

 

 

 

 

 

Each religion tends to intolerance of other religions but forbids intolerance of itself.

 

 

 

 

 

Atheism looks for sincerity and helps people to achieve it.  The wise atheist does not believe that any God is going to help people believe in the truth and that that entitles them to be dogmatic and intolerant.  Tolerance means you allow people to do what you disapprove of and criticise.  It does not mean you must not criticise what they do.  In fact if you didn't express your disapproval it wouldn't be tolerance.  Religion tries to stop people criticising it.  No liar or fraud likes to be looked at by the sceptic. Tolerance is a paradox.  We tolerate in others what we find intolerable.

Any regime, even one that claims to be godless, can be totalitarian.  But if a regime tells people that they are stupid so they need grace from God to see the truth and the truth is that the regime is right then that regime is totalitarian in the fullest sense of the word.  Atheist systems even if they are totalitarian cannot put people down or deceive them to that extent.  Human systems are only human and not so sacred that they cannot be critically examined.  Religious faith and faith in God makes for worse totalitarianism than unbelief ever could.

Religious genocide

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Bible God commands the destruction of God's people who start to follow other gods.  The New Testament describes Hell as the second death or death and Jesus vowed to send people to there for disagreeing with him and disobeying him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atheists should not be so insecure that they would need to resort to mass murder to see the end of religion.

Religion lies that Hitler was an atheist.  Christianity tries to avoid the blame for the Holocaust of the Jews.  But the truth is Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, "In defending myself against the Jews, I am doing the Lord's work".  In Vienna in 1938, Hitler declared after the Anschluss, "I believe that it was God's will that from here a boy was sent into the Reich and that he grew up to become leader of the nation".  

People go to war not for material benefits for themselves or any benefits but to satisfy their sense of loyalty to the leader of the country.  Religion is a personality cult.  Christianity is based on Jesus and Islam on Mohammed and so on.  Atheists don't carry on like that so atheism should lead to less war than religion.

The Church says that Joseph Stalin the monster was an atheist and blames the blood on his hands on atheism.  He ran a Communist atheistic regime.  But read the 1936 Constitution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.  It was the law of Stalin's USSR.  It guaranteed freedom of speech, of assembly, of meetings and street processions.  It guaranteed the rights of the citizen.  It specified that arbitrary arrest was forbidden and that his or her home or correspondence was his business and should not be invaded by the state.  Atheism taught this.  Stalin and the secret police violated it at every turn.  Therefore what they did was the violation of atheism.  Atheism cannot be blamed.

The normal person will feel tremendous compassion for the individual.  And more so when that individual is the victim of random evil such as disease or poverty.  These things can happen to anybody.  The compassion will be made stronger if the person believes the individual will lose everything at death.  Such feelings should urge the atheist to work for a better world.  Religion stunts them by making out that God has a use for evil and disease.  Jesus told the poor to make their poverty worse by giving away their cloak to anybody that steals their coat.  Religious believers don't show much of an inclination to go and help the poor for they feel that God will make it up to the poor in an afterlife.  The atheist who denies the reality of the supernatural miracle of free will will be able to look upon the most vile of actions without hating the perpetrator.  This is the fullest form of atheism for it says people are programmed and not free.  All other forms of atheism fall short. Pure atheism should not lead to trouble but to peace.  It rejects all doctrines that can be used as an excuse for persecuting people while religion reveres such doctrines.

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

Religion does lead to war and suffering and intolerance and the Bible proves it.  Atheism that seeks to help people in their self-development must take its place.

 

Top of the Document

 

BIBLE QUOTATIONS FROM: 

The Amplified Bible

 

BOOKS CONSULTED

 

A Critical Review of Humanist Manifestos 1 & 2, Homer Duncan MC, International Publications, Lubbock Texas. 

A Shattered Visage The Real Face of Atheism, Ravi Zacharias, Wolgemuth & Hyatt, Tenneessee, 1990

A Thief in the Night, John Cornwell, Penguin, London, 1990

A Woman Rides the Beast, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1994

All Roads Lead to Rome, Michael de Semlyen, Dorchester House Publications, Bucks, 1993 (page 120 recounts Cardinal Konig of Vienna’s testimony that the Vatican helped Nazi war criminals to escape)

Apologetics and Catholic Doctrine, Part 1, Most Rev M Sheehan DD, M H Gill & Son, Dublin 1954

Apologetics for the Pulpit, Aloysius Roche Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd, London, 1950

Blind Alley Beliefs, David Cook, Pickering & Inglis, Glasgow, 1979

Catholicism and Fundamentalism, Karl Keating, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1988

Christianity, David Albert Jones, OP, Family Publications, Oxford, 1999

Convert or Die, Edmond Paris, Chick Publications, Chino, California, undated 

Correction and Discipline of Children, John R Rice, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1946 

Crisis of Moral Authority, Don Cupitt, SCM Press, London, 1985 

Documents of the Christian Church, edited by Henry Bettenson, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979 

Does America Need the Moral Majority? William Willoughby, Haven Books, New Jersey, 1981

Does Conscience Decide?  Bishop William J Philbin, Catholic Truth Society of Ireland, Dublin 

Ecumenical Jihad, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1996 

European Union and Roman Catholic Influence In Britain, David N Samuel, The Harrison Trust, Kent, 1995

Fascism in the English Church, A London Journalist, Henry E Walter, London, 1938

Fifty Years in the “Church” of Rome, Charles Chiniquy, Chick Publications, Chino, California, 1985 

God and the Gun, The Church and Irish Terrorism, Martin Dillon, Orion, London, 1998 

God Is Not Great, The Case Against Religion, Christopher Hitchens, Atlantic Books, London, 2007

‘God, That’s not fair!’ Dick Dowsett, OMF Books, Overseas Missionary Fellowship, Belmont, The Vine, Sevenoaks, Kent TN13 3TZ] Kent, 1982 

Handbook of Christian Apologetics, Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli, Monarch, East Sussex, 1995

Human Rights, Michael Bertram Crowe Veritas, Dublin, 1978

In God’s Name, David Yallop, Corgi, London, 1987 

Is the Roman Catholic Church a Secret Society?  John V Simcox, Warren Sandell and Raymond Winch Watts & Co London, 1946 

Is There Salvation Outside The Catholic Church?  Fr J Bainvel SJ, TAN, Illinois, 1979 

Jesuit Plots, From Elizabethan to Modern Times, Albert Close, Protestant Truth Society, London undated 

Jesus the Only Saviour, Tony and Patricia Higton, Monarch Tunbridge Wells, Kent, 1993 

New Catholic Encyclopedia, The Catholic University of America and the McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., Washington, District of Columbia, 1967 

Radio Replies, Vol 1, Frs Rumble and Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota, 1938 

Radio Replies, Vol 2, Frs Rumble and Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota 1940 

Radio Replies, Vol 3, Frs Rumble and Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota 1942 

Religion of Peace? Why Christianity is and Islam Isn't, Robert Spencer, Regnery Publishing Inc, Washington, 2007 - a curious book in that it simply doesn't mention how Christian Scriptures incited believers, eg Calvinists, to attack and destroy other believers who were thought to be heretics and doesn't mention the infallible decrees of the Roman Catholic Church commanding the violent destruction of heretics but wants to give the impression that unlike the Koran, the Christian Scriptures and the Christian religion do not make calls for religious violence

Religious Freedom, A Fundamental Right, Michael Swhwartz, Liguori Publications, Missouri, 1987 

Roman Catholicism, Loraine Boettner, Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, Phillipsburg, New Jersey, 1987

Rome – Our Enemy, Clifford Smyth, Puritan Printing, Belfast, 1975 

Secular Humanism – The Most Dangerous Religion in America, Homer Duncan, MC International Publications, Lubbock, Texas.  Undated. 

Sex Education in Our Public Schools, Jack Hyles, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1969 

Sex, Dissidence and Damnation, Jeffrey Richards, Routledge, London 1994

Spy in the Vatican 1941-45, Branko Bokun, Tom Stacey Books, London, 1973 

Summa Theologica of St Thomas Aquinas, Part II, Second Number, Thomas Baker, London, 1918. 

The Case for Faith, Lee Strobel, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2000

The Christian and War, Robert Moyer, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1946 

The Church of Rome, Wilson Ewin, Bible Baptist Church, Nashua NH USA 

The Encyclopaedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London, 1995

The End Of Faith, Religion, Terror And The Future Of Reason, Sam Harris, Free Press, London, 2005

The Inquisition of the Middle Ages, Henry Charles Lea, Citadel, New York, 1963 

The Last Temptation of Christ, Its Deception and What you Should Do About it, Erwin T Lutzer, Moody Press, Chicago, 1988 

The Pestilence of AIDS, Hugh Pyle, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1987 

The Rise of the Spanish Inquisition, Jean Plaidy, Star, London, 1978 

The Sacred Executioner Human Sacrifice and the Legacy of Guilt Hyam Maccoby Thames and Hudson, London, 1982 

The Secret History of the Jesuits, Edmond Paris, Chick Publications, Chino, California, 1975

The Truth About the Homosexuals, Dr Hugh F Pyle, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1978 

The Truth that Leads to Eternal Life, Watchtower, New York, 1968

The Unequal Yoke, John R Rice, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1946 

The Upside-Down Kingdom, Donald B Kraybill Marshalls, Hants, 1978 

The Vatican Connection, The Explosive Expose of a Billion-Dollar Counterfeit Stock Deal Between the Mafia the Church, Richard Hammers Penguin, Middlesex, 1982 

Their Kingdom Come, Robert Hutchison, Corgi, London, 1997

Unholy Sacrifices of the New Age, Paul de Parrie and Mary Pride, Crossway Books, Westchester, Illinois 1988 

Vatican USA, Nino LoBello, Trident Press, New York, 1972

Vicars of Christ, Peter de Rosa, Corgi Books, London, 1993

Walking with Unbelievers, Michael Paul Gallagher SJ, Veritas Dublin 1985

War and Politics The Christian’s Duty, Peter Watkins, Christadelphian Bible Mission, Birmingham 

What About Those Who Have Never Heard?  Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1986

Whatever Happened to Heaven?  Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Publishers, Oregon, 1988 

 

THE WWW

 

www.infidels.org/library/historical/joseph_mccabe/big_blue_books/book_10.html 

Fascist Romanism Defies Civilisation by Joseph McCabe

 

www.hom.net/~angels/democracy.html 

Democracy is not a good form of Government by Citizens for the Ten Commandments

 

www.mindspring.com/~bab5/BIB/lessons.htm 

Is Christianity a Cult?

 

 

Top of the Document